Society of Hospital Medicine SHM
HomeLogin/LogoutSHM CommunityCareer CenterQI Resource Rooms 
 
sitemap contact questions

About SHM
Membership
Education
Quality Improvement
 
QI Current Initiatives and Training Opportunities
 
QI Basics
 
QI Clinical Tools
 
QI Resource Rooms
 
Clinical Blog: Hospital Medicine Quick Hits
            
Practice Resources
Advocacy
Events
Publications
News, Media & Blogs
Join SHM
SHM Store

Exchange Information Implementation Guide Professional Development Resource Room Project Team Main Resource Room Home Complicated Skin & Skin Structure Infections

Process Flow Mapping

by Michael Radzienda, MD

A Critical QI Tool

Achieving your quality improvement goals will almost certainly require that substantial changes be made to whichever process you target. Although you may think that you understand the gaps between your current process and the best practice, formally mapping the process will likely reveal gaps that would otherwise be overlooked. It will also provide your team with a better understanding of the process in general. Process mapping is really nothing more than writing down everything that happens in a given process. The Web sites of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement(IHI) (http://www.IHI.org) and the American Society for Quality (http://www.asq.org/quality-progress/2003/01/problem-solving/a-simple-process-map.html; accessed June 30, 2009) provide more in-depth information about process mapping. Often, the major steps of the process are defined first, and then each step is analyzed in detail. In some case, the major steps in a process can be accurately defined by a single individual (such as the team leader). However, usually, no individual is able to complete a detailed analysis of all the steps. This highlights the importance of the multidisciplinary team in completing this exercise.

Once the process is mapped, the gaps between the current process and the best practice will become apparent. The members of the team with the most detailed understanding of the best practice will be able to recognize the gaps and highlight them for the team. The assessment questions, presented earlier in this section, can also help team members recognize the gaps.

Ideally, this process will leave the team with a list of gaps that need to be addressed in order to achieve the team’s goals, and this list will be used to create interventions.

Diabetic Foot Infection Process Mapping

Team members should build consensus around the optimal care delivery process for the population studied. This may be based on available evidence, expert opinion, or local standards of care. Some degree of manual chart abstraction will need to occur in order to establish the care delivery process “gap.” Establish high-level process measures and avoid granularity. Nodes in the process map may serve as discrete outcomes measures when tracking the performance of your intervention.

For example, in the flow sheet below, various high-level processes were agreed on by team members and stakeholders. Expectations about the timeliness of these processes also requires consensus. As outlined below, the team agreed that 3 processes needed to occur no later than the patient’s first day of admission to the hospital (see arrows): (1) antibiotics administered; (2) appropriate labs drawn and result received; and (3) wound care evaluation completed. Failure to complete these steps in the specified time frame serves as the metric for tracking performance. Failure modes should be high level and easily measured, for example, “Antibiotics for diabetic foot infection are not routinely given within the first day of hospitalization.”

Download the DFI Inpatient Care Path

Build process maps to better define the steps for each failure mode. Fish diagrams are a useful tool to help drill down process flaws:

Download the BKA due to DFI Fish Diagram

Some considerations and decision points (these may vary between institutions):

  1. Who is responsible for tissue debridement? Some institutions use general surgery services, whereas others rely on vascular surgery, plastic surgery, or even a combination according to ulcer location and depth.
  2. Do the surgical services involved with debridement have their own protocols?
  3. Who will provide amputation services?
  4. Blood glucose management — are pathways in place regarding a diabetes management team, endocrine consultation, or glycemic protocols?
  5. Are ancillary diabetes services available? These may include patient education, nutritionists, and/or social workers.
  6. What wound care services exist at the institution or nearby?
  7. What is the rate of resistant organisms, especially MRSA, in your institution? What are the procedures for surveillance, isolation, and empiric antibiotics?

 

Complicated Skin & Skin Structure Infections (cSSSIs)  Resource Room Project Team
This resource room is sponsored in part by an unrestricted educational grant from Ortho McNeil.

Disclaimer
The Complicated Skin & Skin Structure Infections (cSSSIs) Resource Room is an online resource for visitors to the Society of Hospital Medicine’s website. All content and links have been reviewed by the cSSSIs Resource Room Project Team, however the Society of Hospital Medicine does not exercise any editorial control over content associated with the external links that have been made available via this website.

About SHM  Membership  Education  Quality Improvement  Practice Resources  Advocacy  Events  Publications
News, Media & Blogs  Join SHM  SHM Store  Home  Login/Logout  SHM Community  Career Center  QI Resource Rooms  

©2008 Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM). All rights reserved.

SHM National Office: 1500 Spring Garden, Suite 501, Philadelphia, PA 19130
Phone: 800.843.3360 | Fax: 267.702.2690 | Email: webmaster@hospitalmedicine.org.
Report a problem with this site.