Society of Hospital Medicine SHM
HomeLogoutCareer CenterSHM CommunityQI Resource Rooms 
 
sitemap contact questions
Advanced Search
About SHM
Membership
Education
Quality Improvement
 
QI Current Initiatives and Training Opportunities
 
QI Primer
 
QI Clinical Tools
 
QI Resource Rooms
            
Practice Resources
Advocacy
Events
Publications
News and Media
Join SHM
SHM Store


Exchange Information Implementation Guide Professional Development Resource Room Project Team Main Resource Room Home Venous Thromboembolism Resource Room

Key Metric # 2

Performance Tracking (selecting and reporting metrics)

Key metric # 2: incidence of hospital-acquired VTE

Ultimately what your team cares most about is how well the steps of care delivery come together to prevent hospital-acquired VTE, the main clinical endpoint/outcome. Clearly, the incidence of hospital-acquired VTE must be one of your team’s key metrics.

A common definition for “hospital-acquired DVT or PE” would be a clot first discovered during the course of hospitalization, or discovered within 30 days of a prior hospitalization.

There are various methods for trying to capture this metric in a useful way, each with its own advantages in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

   Methods for Defining Hospital-Acquired VTE

Method 1
(Minimum)

Track total # DVT and PE diagnosis codes in your medical center.*

Method 2
(Better)

Method 1, then pull charts post-discharge and retrospectively determine if hospital or community acquired.

Method 3
(Better yet)

Method 2, then retrospectively determine if hospital-acquired VTE were on appropriate prophylaxis when VTE developed.

Method 4
(Best)

Prospectively capture new cases of DVT or PE as they occur by setting up reporting system with radiology departments.

*Then divide by 2 to estimate the fraction that is hospital-acquired. The literature suggests that approximately half of all cases of DVT and PE diagnosed in the hospital are hospital-acquired. Alternately, use all VTE codes listed as a secondary diagnosis as a surrogate for hospital-acquired VTE.

The first method is very simple and can be done with no effort, but you won’t have confidence that you are reducing hospital-acquired VTE without some form of chart review. The diagnosis codes for DVT and PE appear in Appendix B.

The “Better yet” option introduces the concept that you can actually get more from the chart review than just a classification of “hospital-acquired” versus “community- acquired.” The VTE can now also be classified as “hospital-acquired while on appropriate prophylaxis” versus “hospital-acquired while not on appropriate prophylaxis.” With this method you can plot the incidence of “preventable HA-VTE,” a subset of all HA-VTE events that communicates the most about your entire VTE prevention effort. This option would also allow you to look for other factors that led to the formation of a hospital-acquired clot. For example, was the patient sedated or restrained? Did the patient have a central line associated clot, and if so, was the line really needed at the time the clot formed? Given the time and resources, you could do a mini-root cause analysis to generate other potential strategies to prevent hospital-acquired VTE.

The “Best” option has all of the advantages listed above, but with the additional advantages that chart review is much easier when the patient is still in the hospital. And the chart review can also be more efficient if you have the capability to query your digital imaging system to screen all pertinent imaging studies on a regular basis. In the 350 bed facility at UCSD a nurse or nurse practitioner screens all pertinent studies from the prior day, identifies all new hospital-acquired clots, and completes a thorough chart review on all new hospital-acquired VTE. The whole process takes less than an hour on each weekday. It can be done very efficiently by using automated search criteria if your radiology department uses a digital imaging system – you can create a reporting system that pulls up all pertinent diagnostic studies, complete with their reports, at the click of a button.

You may well come up with another method that is more useful and expedient in your setting.

Once you define “hospital-acquired VTE” and how you will find them, you have another decision. Will you simply track the raw number of hospital-acquired VTE, or do you want to control for the number of patients or patient-days? Controlling for patient days at risk for VTE does add a little more work, but would reduce some of the “noise” in your data by controlling for the probability that more hospital-acquired VTE will occur when you have a full census. At UCSD, for example, each month we calculate the total number of patient days for adult inpatients in the hospital > 48 hours and use that as the denominator. We use the total number of hospital-acquired VTE events is used as the numerator. This helped us generate a specific aim, outlined in the next section. 

Another option to consider if you have the capacity to look at all newly diagnosed events of DVT and PE in your medical center: if you can track the number of days between hospital- acquired VTE events and/or hospital-acquired preventable VTE events, a “days between events” would be a great way to demonstrate progress (each event is a point on the x axis, while the number of days between events appears on the y axis).

OK, enough background and options. Now it’s time for your team to decide, given the resources at your hospital, how you will measure the incidence of hospital-acquired VTE.

camera

To Do (Snapshot Item): 
Select a method for measuring incidence of HA-VTE. Plot baseline rate of hospital-acquired VTE for your target group. Work with Health Information Systems or Radiology Information Systems to set up the data flow. When post-intervention data starts coming in, plot on same run chart.

Download the VTE Implementation Guide Snapshot

 

 

 

Venous Thromboembolism Resource Room Project Team
This resource room is sponsored in part by an unrestricted educational grant from Sanofi Aventis

Disclaimer
The Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Resource Room is an online resource for visitors to the Society of Hospital Medicine’s website. All content and links have been reviewed by the VTE Resource Room Project Team, however the Society of Hospital Medicine does not exercise any editorial control over content associated with the external links that have been made available via this website.

The contributions of Dr. Maynard and his UCSD collaborators in the development of the SHM VTE Prevention Resource Room and the VTE Prevention Implementation Guide were supported by grant number 1U18HS015826-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The contents of this product are solely the responsibility of Dr. Maynard and the SHM VTE Resource Room team, and do not necessarily represent the official view of or imply endorsement by AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

About SHM  Membership  Education  Quality Improvement  Practice Resources  Advocacy  Events  Publications
News and Media  Join SHM  SHM Store  Home  Login/Logout  Career Center  SHM Community  QI Resource Rooms  

©2007 Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM). All rights reserved.

SHM National Office: 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: 800.843.3360 | Fax: 215.351.2536 | Email: webmaster@hospitalmedicine.org.
Report a problem with this site.