Society of Hospital Medicine SHM
HomeLogin/LogoutSHM CommunityCareer CenterQI Resource Rooms 
 
sitemap contact questions
Advanced Search
About SHM
Membership
Education
Quality Improvement
 
QI Current Initiatives and Training Opportunities
 
QI Basics
 
QI Clinical Tools
 
QI Resource Rooms
 
Clinical Blog: Hospital Medicine Quick Hits
            
Practice Resources
Advocacy
Events
Publications
News, Media & Blogs
Development
Join SHM
Make a Gift
SHM Store

Printer Friendly Page this page

Quality Improvement  
Exchange Information Implementation Guide Professional Development Resource Room Project Team Main Resource Room Home Glycemic Control Resource Room

Trending Data Over Time: Run Charts

Although summary tables performed before and after implementation of your insulin order set/protocol might be helpful to some degree, trending over time using run charts is preferred. Run charts have several advantages over before-and-after summaries: it’s easier to see the effect of different aspects of your interventions as they occur, you get a quicker picture of whether something is working, it is easier to separate out the impact of your intervention from secular trends, and our brains simply interpret run chart graphical displays more innately than they do tables or columns.

The following table of results from the UCSD glycemic control effort demonstrate the advantages of run charts over tabular reporting. The study population was patients in adult, non–critical care wards, with pregnant patients excluded. An individual mean glucose was calculated for all patients with 8 or more bedside glucose meter readings. Only the first 14 days of monitoring were included to prevent skewing of the mean in those with outlier length of stays. Glucose values ≤ 60 mg/dL were excluded from calculations of the mean. The baseline period went through September 2003, a standardized insulin order set was implemented in October 2003, and an algorithm supporting the order set was successfully piloted in May 2005.

.
Results of UCSD Glycemic Control Effort


Month

No. of patients with mean glucose < 180 mg/dL

No. of patients with mean glucose180 mg/dL

Total number of patients monitored

Percentage of patients with mean glucose < 180 mg/dL

Oct  2002

30

20

50

60

Nov 2002

59

56

115

51

Dec 2002

74

52

126

59

Jan  2003

69

58

127

54

Feb  2003

62

42

104

60

Mar  2003

79

47

126

63

Apr  2003

75

25

100

75

May 2003

84

46

130

65

Jun  2003

75

42

117

64

Jul   2003

73

48

121

60

Aug 2003

74

50

124

60

Sep 2003

97

44

141

69

Oct  2003

104

48

152

68

Nov 2003

90

59

149

60

Dec 2003

93

47

140

66

Jan  2004

94

49

143

66

Feb  2004

78

39

117

67

Mar  2004

98

44

142

69

Apr  2004

119

50

169

70

May 2004

118

57

175

67

Jun  2004

105

49

154

68

Jul   2004

121

57

178

68

Aug 2004

121

37

158

77

Sep 2004

95

46

141

67

Oct  2004

118

53

171

69

Nov 2004

104

51

155

67

Dec 2004

91

40

131

70

Jan  2005

123

62

185

67

Feb  2005

112

38

150

75

Mar  2005

116

53

169

69

Apr  2005

114

47

161

71

May 2005

122

57

179

68

Jun  2005

126

54

180

70

Jul   2005

143

72

198

72

Aug 2005

130

57

187

69

Sep 2005

130

56

186

70

Oct  2005

145

39

184

79

Nov 2005

157

41

198

75

Dec 2005

157

46

203

77

Do you feel inspired by the numerous data points listed in this table? Are you convinced the order set or algorithm made a difference in increasing the percentage of patients with a mean < 180 mg/dL? The run chart below shows essentially the same data in a different format.


Run Chart with Statistical Process Control (SPC) Limits Showing
Percentage of Patients at UCSD with a Mean Glucose ≤ 180 mg/dL

chart
CPOE = computerized physician order entry.


Time is shown on the X axis, and the percentage of patients achieving a mean of ≤180 mg/dL is shown on the Y axis. The red horizontal line represents the mean percentage of patients achieving this goal. The vertical line represents the beginning of the first intervention (the subcutaneous insulin order set), whereas the star indicates when the pilot of an algorithm guiding prescribers through insulin ordering in different patient situations took place. The improvement in glycemic control is highly statistically significant. The human eye can often detect statistically and clinically relevant change before you could ever pick it up in a table.

You can build your run charts using Excel, statistical packages, or even use the IHI’s tool for run charts, the Improvement Tracker.

The following chart is a presentation of summary data from the same institution. It shows the percentage of patients with a mean patient-stay glucose in the indicated ranges over three periods (baseline, intervention 1 [order set], intervention 2 [algorithm]).


chart

View several examples of run charts, data summaries, and other methods of tracking and trending glucometrics and other important parameters.

 

 

 

Glycemic Control Resource Room Project Team
This resource room is supported in part by a non-educational sponsorship from sanofi-aventis US, LLC

Disclaimer
The Glycemic Control Resource Room is an online resource for visitors to the Society of Hospital Medicine's website. All content and links have been reviewed by the Glycemic Control Resource Room Project Team, however the Society of Hospital Medicine does not exercise any editorial control over content associated with the external links that have been made available via this website.
About SHM  Membership  Education  Quality Improvement  Practice Resources  Advocacy  Events  Publications
News and Media  Join SHM  SHM Store  Home  Login/Logout  Career Center  SHM Community  QI Resource Rooms  

©2008 Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM). All rights reserved.

SHM National Office: 1500 Spring Garden, Suite 501, Philadelphia, PA 19130
Phone: 800.843.3360 | Fax: 267.702.2690 | Email: webmaster@hospitalmedicine.org.
Report a problem with this site.